During a meeting of the âGreenEvo – Green Technology Accelerator” Jury held on 11.03.2013, not only new participants of the 4th edition of the project were selected, but also the winners of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd edition were subject to annual evaluation. The companies were analysed in detail on the basis of the âAnnual winner evaluation form” they submitted.
For each enterprise one of the three recommendations listed below is available:
1. Cessation of support for the winner of the GreenEvo – Green Technologies Accelerator, and depriving them of the right to use the status of the Competition winner.
2. Continued promotion of the technology of the GreenEvo – Green Technologies Accelerator winner by the Ministry of the Environment, and enabling the companies to use the status of the Competition winner, but not granting them with support referred to in Article 1(2) point 2 of the Terms and Conditions of the Competition.
3. Continued promotion of the technology of the GreenEvo – Green Technologies Accelerator winner by the Ministry of the Environment, and enabling the companies to use the status of the Competition winner and providing them with support referred to in Article 1(2) point 2 of the Terms and Conditions of the Competition.
The evaluation was conditional on submitting the annual evaluation form within the deadline specified; failure to meet that requirement deprives the winner of the right to benefit from financial support in 2013. Thus, three companies listed below were denied financial support for this year:
1. Sunex S.A. (1st edition),
2. ATON – HT (2nd edition),
3. Polimat Eko Sp. z o.o. (2nd edition).
The Table below contains the voting results of the Jury:
|
RECOMMENDATION |
|
Cessation of support for the GreenEvo – Green Technologies Accelerator winner, and depriving them of the right to use the status of the Competition winner. |
|
NONE |
|
Continued promotion of the technology of the GreenEvo – Green Technologies Accelerator winner by the Ministry of the Environment, and enabling the companies to use the status of the Competition winner, but not granting them with support referred to in Article 1(2) point 2 of the Terms and Conditions of the Competition. |
|
BIOGRADEX |
|
ECOTECH POLSKA |
|
ENERGOINSTAL |
|
NEON |
|
PETROSTER |
|
MARBET-WIL |
|
SUNEX |
|
ATON HT |
|
POLIMAT EKO |
|
Continued promotion of the technology of the GreenEvo – Green Technologies Accelerator winner by the Ministry of the Environment, and enabling the companies to use the status of the Competition winner and providing them with support referred to in Article 1(2) point 2 of the Terms and Conditions of the Competition.
|
|
ASKET |
|
PP-EKO |
|
PROMAR |
|
WATT |
|
WOFIL |
|
APANET |
|
APS ENERGIA |
|
CHEMADEX |
|
CTE CARBOTECH ENGINEERING |
|
DAGAS |
|
FU-WI |
|
URSUS |
|
PROCOM SYSTEM |
|
REDOR |
|
WSK KRAKÃW |
|
ECO IN |
|
EKOTECH INŻYNIERIA POPIOÅÃW |
|
HEWALEX |
|
HYDROERGIA |
|
IZODOM 2000 POLSKA |
|
JAKUSZ |
|
LARS |
|
MAKROTERM |
|
QENERGY |
|
TECHNOLOGIE EKOLOGICZNE ZBIGNIEW TOKARZ |
|
EKOTOP |
|
MULTICHEM-EKO |
|
NMG |
|
PROTE |
|
ZI PROMIS |
|
LEDIKO |